The Airflow's "worst"-ness derives from its spectacularly bad timing.
Twenty years later, the car's many design and engineering innovations —
the aerodynamic singlet-style fuselage, steel-spaceframe construction,
near 50-50 front-rear weight distribution and light weight — would have
been celebrated. As it was, in 1934, the car's dramatic streamliner
styling antagonized Americans on some deep level, almost as if it were
designed by Bolsheviks. It didn't help that a few early Airflows had
major, engine-falling-out-type problems that stemmed from the radical
construction techniques required. Chrysler, and the even more hapless
Desoto, tried to devolve the Airflow stylistically, giving it more
conventional grill and raising the trunk into a kind of bustle (some
later models were named Airstream), but the damage was done. Sales were
abysmal. It wouldn't be the last time American car buyers looked at the
future and said, "no thanks."
What makes a car bad? Is it the car with the worst exterior styling? The most dreadful interior? The most uncomfortable ride? The least reliable/most poorly made? Or is it a dismal combination of all these factors? For our purposes, the worst car in the world is not only the vehicle that incorporates the most of these negative traits, but also more importantly, has no redeeming qualities of what makes a car great whatsoever.
Friday, December 11, 2015
1933 Fuller Dymaxion
Designer-genius R. Buckminster Fuller was one of the century's great
nutjobs, a walking unorthodoxy who originally conceived of the Dymaxion
as a flying automobile, or drivable plane, with jet engines and
inflatable wings. It would be one link in his vaguely totalitarian plan
for the people to live in mass-produced houses deposited on the
landscape by dirigibles. Okayyyy...Deprived of wings, the
Dymaxion was a three-wheel, ground-bound zeppelin, with a huge levered
A-arm carrying the rear wheel, which swiveled like the tail wheel of an
airplane. The first prototype had a wicked death wobble in the rear
wheel. The next two Dymaxions were bigger, heavier, and only marginally
more drivable. The third car had a stabilizer fin on top, which did
nothing to cure the Dymaxion's acute instability in crosswinds. A fatal
accident involving the car — cause unknown — doomed its public
acceptance. Though unworkable, this three-wheeled suppository was the
boldest of a series of futuristic, rear-engined cars of the 1930s,
including the Tatra, the Highway Aircraft Corporation's "Fascination"
car and, everybody's favorite, the Nazi's KdF-wagen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)