They shoot horses, don't they? Well, this is fish in a barrel. Of course
the Pinto goes on the Worst list, but not because it was a particularly
bad car — not particularly — but because it had a rather volatile
nature. The car tended to erupt in flame in rear-end collisions. The
Pinto is at the end of one of autodom's most notorious paper trails, the
Ford Pinto memo , which ruthlessly calculates the cost of reinforcing
the rear end ($121 million) versus the potential payout to victims ($50
million). Conclusion? Let 'em burn.
What makes a car bad? Is it the car with the worst exterior styling? The most dreadful interior? The most uncomfortable ride? The least reliable/most poorly made? Or is it a dismal combination of all these factors? For our purposes, the worst car in the world is not only the vehicle that incorporates the most of these negative traits, but also more importantly, has no redeeming qualities of what makes a car great whatsoever.
Friday, December 11, 2015
1971 Chrysler Imperial LeBaron Two-Door Hardtop
The glamorous Imperial marque was, by the late '60s, reduced to a
trashy, pseudo-luxury harlot walking the streets for its pimp, the
Chrysler Corporation. By 1971, only the Imperial LeBaron was left and it
shared the monstrous slab-sided "fuselage" styling of corporate
siblings like the Chrysler New Yorker and the Dodge Monaco. Appearing to
have been hewn from solid blocks of mediocrity, the Imperial LeBaron
two-door is memorable for having some of the longest fenders in history.
It was powered by Chrysler's silly-big 440-cu.-in. V8 and measured over
19 ft. long. The interior looked like a third-world casino. Here we are
approaching the nadir of American car building — obese,
under-engineered, horribly ugly. Or, it would be the nadir, except for
the abysmal 1980 Chrysler Imperial, which had an engine cursed by God.
The Imperial name was finally overthrown in 1983.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)