By the mid-1990s, car designers had powerful new computer tools at their
disposal, allowing them to pursue low-volume, high-zoot projects that
before would never have recovered the development costs. The Prowler was
one such project. Inspired, if not plagiarized, by a retro-roadster
design by Chip Foose, the Prowler looked like a dry-lake speedster from
the 22nd century, with an open-wheel front end and low-slung hotrod
fuselage. Except they forgot to make it a hotrod. Intent on containing
costs, Chrysler stuck its standard-issue 3.5-liter V6 under the hood,
good for a rather less than spectacular 250 hp. The Prowler didn't even
have a manual transmission, which made it almost impossible to lay down
the requisite stripes of hot rubber. The result was a flaccid little
jerk of a car that threatened much but delivered little.
What makes a car bad? Is it the car with the worst exterior styling? The most dreadful interior? The most uncomfortable ride? The least reliable/most poorly made? Or is it a dismal combination of all these factors? For our purposes, the worst car in the world is not only the vehicle that incorporates the most of these negative traits, but also more importantly, has no redeeming qualities of what makes a car great whatsoever.
Friday, December 11, 2015
1997 GM EV1
The EV1 was a marvel of engineering, absolutely the best electric
vehicle anyone had ever seen. Built by GM to comply with California's
zero-emissions-vehicle mandate, the EV1 was quick, fun, and reliable. It
held out the promise that soon electric cars — charged from the grid
with all sorts of groovy power sources, like wind and solar — could
replace the smelly old internal-combustion vehicle. And therein lies the
problem: the promise. In fact, battery technology at the time was
nowhere near ready to replace the piston-powered engine. The early car's
lead-acid bats, and even the later nickel-metal hydride batteries,
couldn't supply the range or durability required by the mass market. The
car itself was a tiny, super-light two-seater, not exactly what
American consumers were looking for. And the EV1 was horrifically
expensive to build, which was why GM's execs terminated the program —
handing detractors yet another stick to beat them with. GM, the company
that had done more to advance EV technology than any other, became the
company that "killed the electric car."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)