It's surprising, considering that Chrysler and GM are in the same town,
that GM didn't learn from the Plymouth Prowler episode. When GM decided
to kick up some custom retro mojo, it commissioned the Chevy SSR, an
awesome-looking hotrod pickup truck with composite body panels and a
slick convertible top. Alas, the chassis and mechanics for the SSR
were borrowed from GM's corporate midsize SUV program, making the
putative performance machine heavy, underpowered and unforgivably lazy.
It was no more hotrod than Britney is the next Helen Mirren. In the next
couple of years, Chevy amped up the SSR but by then the credibility was
gone. The SSR also violated a principle of hotrodding. Hotrods are
homemade subversion of the existing order, mechanical folk art. There
is no such thing as a factory hotrod. Seems obvious, in retrospect.
What makes a car bad? Is it the car with the worst exterior styling? The most dreadful interior? The most uncomfortable ride? The least reliable/most poorly made? Or is it a dismal combination of all these factors? For our purposes, the worst car in the world is not only the vehicle that incorporates the most of these negative traits, but also more importantly, has no redeeming qualities of what makes a car great whatsoever.
Friday, December 11, 2015
2003 Hummer H2
One struggles to think of a worse vehicle at a worse time. Introduced
shortly after 9/11 — an event whose causes were tangled in America's
unquenchable thirst for oil — the Hummer H2 sent all the wrong signals.
It was/is arrogantly huge, overtly militaristic, openly scornful of the
common good. As a vehicle choice, the H2 was a spiteful reactionary
riposte to notions that, you know, maybe we all shouldn't be driving
tanks that get 10 miles per gallon. Not surprisingly, the green-niks
struck back. A Hummer dealership was torched in Southern California. The
H2 was also a PR catastrophe for GM, who happened to be repossessing
and crushing the few EV1 electric cars at the time. It all contributed
to GM's emerging image as the Dick Cheney of car companies.
2002 BMW 7-series
The Munich company's flagship sedan was nothing less than everything the
company knew about car building, and that was quite a lot. Perfectly
constructed, astonishingly fast and utterly besotted with technology,
the big, gracious 7-series had but two flaws: The first was something
called iDrive, a rotary dial/joystick controller situated on the center
console, through which drivers adjusted dozens of vehicle settings, from
climate, navigation and audio functions to things like the sound of the
door chime. The reason for iDrive and similar systems is that designers
were running out of room for switches and instruments. The trouble was
that the iDrive was hard to work. Damn near impossible, in fact. Drivers
spent many hair-pulling minutes driving to figure out how to add radio
presets, for example, or turn up the air conditioning. When confronted
with complaints, BMW engineers said, with barely disguised contempt: Ze system werks pervectly. Dis is no problem.
Since 2002, BMW has gradually improved iDrive to make it more
intuitive, but it's still a pain. The other flaw? The silly bubble butt,
called the Bangle Bustle, after lead designer Chris Bangle.
2001 Pontiac Aztek
I was in the audience at the Detroit auto show the day GM unveiled the
Pontiac Aztek and I will never forget the gasp that audience made. Holy
hell! This car could not have been more instantly hated if it had a
Swastika tattoo on its forehead. In later interviews with GM designers —
who, for decency's sake, will remain unnamed — it emerged that the
Aztek design had been fiddled with, fussed over, cost-shaved and
otherwise compromised until the tough, cool-looking concept had been
reduced to a bulky, plastic-clad mess. A classic case of losing the
plot. The Aztek violates one of the principal rules of car design: We
like cars that look like us. With its multiple eyes and supernumerary
nostrils, the Aztek looks deformed and scary, something that dogs bark
at and cathedrals employ to ring bells (cf., Fiat Multipla). The shame
is, under all that ugliness, there was a useful, competent crossover.
2001 Jaguar X-Type
A business case is not the same as wisdom. Certainly, Jaguar needed an
entry-luxury model to compete against the BMW 3-series and Mercedes-Benz
C-class. Yes, the company, owned by Ford, had access to a very
successful world car platform, the Mondeo, which Americans knew as the
Ford Contour. There was money to be saved. But in its attempt to turn
the front-drive compact car into an "all-wheel drive" sports sedan,
Jaguar ran smack into the limits of platform engineering. The result was
the English version of the Cadillac Cimarron, a tarted-up insult to a
once-proud marque and a financial disaster for the company. It hardly
matters that the X-Type was not that bad a car. Young affluent buyers
had the feeling they were somehow being grifted. They were.
2000 Ford Excursion
GM had its H2. Ford had the Excursion, a Mount Rushmore-sized SUV based
on the company's Super Duty truck platform. Dubbed the Ford "Valdez" by
the Sierra Club, the Excursion was a passenger vehicle of gob-smacking
proportions. It weighed 7,000 lbs, measured almost 19 ft. long and stood
6.5 ft. tall. At the time, Ford argued that many of its customers —
ranchers, farmers, um, tugboat enthusiasts — needed a vehicle this big
with over 10,000-lb. towing capacity. Maybe that was true, but that
didn't keep Suzy Homemakers from driving them to the mall. To its
dubious credit, the Excursion pioneered the use of the blocker bar, a
kind of under-vehicle roll bar designed to keep the Excursion from
rolling over anything unfortunate enough to be hit by it. The Simpsons wrote the Excursion's cultural obituary in the episode where Marge buys the "Canyonero." "Can you name the truck with four wheel drive, smells like a steak and seats thirty-five...Canyoner-oooo!"
1998 Fiat Multipla
"Multipla" is a time-honored name for Fiat. The company made an adorable
microvan by that name in the '50s and '60s, based on the Fiat 600. The
Multipla that appeared in 1998 was anything but adorable. With its
strange high-beam lenses situated at the bottom of the A-pillars (base
of the windshield), the Multipla looked like it had several sets of
eyes, like an irradiated tadpole. It had this weird proboscis out front
and a bulky, glass cabin in back, and the whole thing was situated on
dwarfish wheels. I rented one of these in Europe and it worked
beautifully, but it was just so tragic to look at. The Multipla (and the
Aztek and the Consulier GTP) reminds us that cars cannot just work
beautifully. They have to be beautiful. At least they can't look like
this.
1997 Plymouth Prowler
By the mid-1990s, car designers had powerful new computer tools at their
disposal, allowing them to pursue low-volume, high-zoot projects that
before would never have recovered the development costs. The Prowler was
one such project. Inspired, if not plagiarized, by a retro-roadster
design by Chip Foose, the Prowler looked like a dry-lake speedster from
the 22nd century, with an open-wheel front end and low-slung hotrod
fuselage. Except they forgot to make it a hotrod. Intent on containing
costs, Chrysler stuck its standard-issue 3.5-liter V6 under the hood,
good for a rather less than spectacular 250 hp. The Prowler didn't even
have a manual transmission, which made it almost impossible to lay down
the requisite stripes of hot rubber. The result was a flaccid little
jerk of a car that threatened much but delivered little.
1997 GM EV1
The EV1 was a marvel of engineering, absolutely the best electric
vehicle anyone had ever seen. Built by GM to comply with California's
zero-emissions-vehicle mandate, the EV1 was quick, fun, and reliable. It
held out the promise that soon electric cars — charged from the grid
with all sorts of groovy power sources, like wind and solar — could
replace the smelly old internal-combustion vehicle. And therein lies the
problem: the promise. In fact, battery technology at the time was
nowhere near ready to replace the piston-powered engine. The early car's
lead-acid bats, and even the later nickel-metal hydride batteries,
couldn't supply the range or durability required by the mass market. The
car itself was a tiny, super-light two-seater, not exactly what
American consumers were looking for. And the EV1 was horrifically
expensive to build, which was why GM's execs terminated the program —
handing detractors yet another stick to beat them with. GM, the company
that had done more to advance EV technology than any other, became the
company that "killed the electric car."
1995 Ford Explorer
How could the best-selling passenger vehicle in America 14 years
running, the mother of all mom-mobiles, the beloved suburban schlepper
of millions, wind up on this list? Forget about the whole Firestone tire
controversy. In its very success, the Ford Explorer is responsible for
setting this country on the spiral of vehicular obesity that we are
still contending with today. People, particularly women drivers,
discovered that they liked sitting up high. Even though more
fuel-efficient minivans do the kid- and cargo-hauling duties better,
people came to prefer the outdoorsy, go-anywhere image of SUVs. In other
words, people became addicted to the pose. And, as vehicles got bigger
and heavier, buyers sought out even bigger vehicles to make themselves
feel safe. Helloooo Hummer. All of that we can lay at the overachieving feet of the Explorer.
1986 Lamborghini LM002
This V12-powered super dune buggy gets on the list — well, my list
anyway — purely because of its appalling clientele. The "Rambo Lambo"
was the civilian version of a military vehicle that Lamborghini sold to
those beacons of democracy, Saudi Arabia and Libya, among others. The
luxurious LM002 appealed to spoiled young Saudi sheiks wanting to cross
the sand to survey their oil field holdings. Uday Hussein, son of
Saddam, had one, which the U.S. military cheerfully blew up in 2004
during a "test" to simulate the effects of a car bomb. The LM002 is the
forerunner of another large and unnecessary SUV that signals pure
contempt for one's fellow man, the Hummer H2. Read on.
1985 Yugo GV
Malcolm Bricklin, he of the Bricklin SV1, wouldn't be satisfied until he
had forced every American to walk to work. To that end, in 1985, he
began importing the Yugo GV, which turned out to be the Mona Lisa of bad
cars. Built in Soviet-bloc Yugoslavia, the Yugo had the distinct
feeling of something assembled at gunpoint. Interestingly, in a car
where "carpet" was listed as a standard feature, the Yugo had a
rear-window defroster — reportedly to keep your hands warm while you
pushed it. The engines went ka-blooey, the electrical system — such as
it was — would sizzle, and things would just fall off. Yugo. Or not.
1985 Mosler Consulier GTP
Warren Mosler, a brilliant economist and investor, built his sports
racer out of bits and parts that fell off the Big Three's table — a
steering wheel from a minivan here, a Chrysler engine there, some
mismatched gauges — but mostly what he did was to add lightness. The
resulting fiberglass-bodied car had a marvelous power-to-weight ratio
and did so well in racing that it was eventually banned. Or it might
have been that the course workers were suffering from post-traumatic
stress from the sight of the thing. Mosler had thought of everything but
a stylist, and the pride and joy of this arch-capitalist looked like
something from an East German kit-car company. Truly one of the ugliest
cars ever, the Consulier GTP proved once and for all that building a car
is harder than it looks.
1984 Maserati Biturbo
"Biturbo" is, of course, Italian for "expensive junk." At least, it is
now, after Maserati tried to pass off this bitter heartbreak-on-wheels
as a proper grand touring sedan. The Biturbo was the product of a
desperate, under-funded company circling the drain of bankruptcy, and it
shows. Everything that could leak, burn, snap or rupture did so with
the regularity of the Anvil Chorus. The collected service advisories
would look like the Gutenberg Bible. The only greater ignominy was the
early 1990s Maserati TC, a version of the Chrysler Le Baron (a flaccid,
front-drive, four-cylinder loser-mobile) with the proud Mazzer Trident
on the nose. Finally, sir, have you no shame?
1982 Camaro Iron Duke
There was a time when 90 horsepower was a lot, and that time was 1932.
Fifty years later, it was bupkis, especially under the hood of Chevy's
beloved Mustang-fighter, the Camaro. As the base engine for the
redesigned 1982 Camaro (and Pontiac Firebird), the 2.5-liter,
four-cylinder "Iron Duke" was the smallest, least powerful, most
un-Camaro-like engine that could be and, like the California Corvette,
it was connected to a low-tech three-speed slushbox. So equipped, the
Iron Duke Camaro had 0-60 mph acceleration of around 20 seconds, which
left Camaro owners to drum their fingers while school buses rocketed
past in a blur of yellow.
1982 Cadillac Cimarron
The horror. The horror. Everything that was wrong, venal, lazy and
mendacious about GM in the 1980s was crystallized in this flagrant
insult to the good name and fine customers of Cadillac. Spooked by the
success of premium small cars from Mercedes-Benz, GM elected to rebadge
its awful mass-market J-platform sedans, load them up with chintzy
fabrics and accessories and call them "Cimarron, by Cadillac." Wha...?
Who? Seeking an even hotter circle of hell, GM priced these
pseudo-caddies (with four-speed manual transmissions, no less) thousands
more than their Chevy Cavalier siblings. This bit of temporizing nearly
killed Cadillac and remains its biggest shame.
1981 De Lorean DMC-12
Automotive icon, snappy dresser and FBI target John Z. De Lorean left
the building in 2005, leaving behind 8,582 stainless-steel DeLoreans and
one time-traveling hotrod. Few car projects were more maledicted than
the DMC-12. By the time Johnny Z. got the factory in Northern Ireland up
and running — and what could possibly go wrong there? — the losses were
piling up fast. The car was heavy, underpowered (the 2.8-liter Peugeot
V6 never had a chance) and overpriced. And De Lorean was having a few
dramas of his own, resulting in one of law enforcement's more memorable
hidden-camera tableaux: the former GM executive sitting in a hotel room
with suitcases on money, discussing the supply-and-demand of nose candy.
The Giugiaro-designed DMC-12 sure was cool looking, though. In August
of this year, the Texas company that controls the rights to the name
announced it will build a small number of new DMC-12's. How's that for
time travel?
1981 Cadillac Fleetwood V-8-6-4
These days, cylinder deactivation, or variable displacement, is
relatively common — the 2008 Honda Accord V6 has it, for instance. And
it's a beautiful idea. When the engine is running at light loads, it's
logical to shut down unneeded cylinders to save fuel, like turning off
lights in unused rooms. But in 1981, when semiconductors and on-board
computers were still in their infancy, variable displacement was a huge
technical challenge. GM deserves credit for trying, but the V-8-6-4 was
the Titanic of engine programs. The cars jerked, bucked, stalled, made
rude noises and generally misbehaved until wild-eyed owners took the
cars to have the system disconnected. For some it was the last time they
ever saw the inside of a Cadillac dealership.
1980 Ferrari Mondial 8
Even the legendary Italian sports car company whiffs once in a while,
and the first Ferrari Mondial was a big red disaster. Based on the 308
chassis, this large and relatively heavy 2+2 coupe had a mere 214 hp on
tap from its transversely mounted, mid-engine V8, and its
transistor-based electronics had more bugs than a Barstow motel
rollaway. Eventually, every single system would fail, not infrequently
accompanied by the smell of burning wires. The factory-authorized
service, meanwhile, was more like factory-authorized extortion. It
hasn't helped the Mondial reputation that it was one of the "cheap"
Ferraris, within reach of a reasonably successful orthodontist. Mondials
eventually got much better. They could hardly get worse.
1980 Corvette 305 "California"
Federal emissions requirements of the 1970s took a big neutering knife
to American muscle cars, and no car bled more than the Corvette. The
worst of it came in California — dang hippy librels! — where
stricter state regs required that the barely adequate 350 cu.-in.
smallblock in the 1980 Corvette be replaced with a wholly inadequate 305
V8, putting out 180 hp of pure shame. On top of that, the "California"
Corvette sucked its pitiful rivulet of horsepower through the straw of a
torque-sapping three-speed automatic transmission. That gave the
Corvette — the very totem of hairy-chest, disco machismo — acceleration
comparable to a very hot Vespa. These were dark days indeed.
1978 AMC Pacer
A recent poll by Hagerty Insurance asked enthusiasts to name the worst
car design of all time: This glassine bolus of dorkiness is the pathetic
winner. Remember Richard Teague, designer of the amputated Gremlin? Him
again. But, come on, the Pacer, it's Wayne and Garth's Mirth-mobile,
for Heaven's sake! You can't hate on that. Indeed, my family owned a
dark green Pacer with that Navajo-blanket upholstery, and it worked just
fine until I drove it through a ditch, after which the heavy doors hung
off their hinges like beagle ears. What I remember of this car is that,
in the summer, it was like being an ant under a mean kid's magnifying
glass. The air conditioning was non-existent. You could actually see
fumes of volatile petrochemicals out-gassing from the plastic dash.
Wayne, I feel woozy.
1976 Chevy Chevette
I include the Chevy Chevette only to note that even the most unloved and
unlovely cars have their partisans. There are Pacer fan clubs and Yugo
fan clubs, and if there is a Chevette fan club, let it begin with me. My
girlfriend in college had a diaper-brown Chevette three-door hatchback,
as bare bones as an exhibit at the natural history museum. It had a
51-hp engine and a four-speed manual transmission and not much else. It
was loud and it was tinny, but we drove that car across the country
three times and it never failed us. Once I got a 85-mph speeding ticket
in it. That was on the down slope of the Appalachians, but still. The
last time I saw that Chevette it was still plugging along. Vaya con
Dios, old paint.
1976 Aston Martin Lagonda
In the disco days of the 1970s, even supercars were cocaine-thin. Meet
the Aston Martin Lagonda, a four-door exotic that lived on dinner mints
and hot water. Designed by AM penman William Towns — undoubtedly wearing
a very large cravat at the time — the Lagonda was as beautiful a car as
ever resembled a pencil box. Mechanically, it was a catastrophe, Aston
Martin's Dunkirk. The company decided to build the Lagonda with a brace
of cutting-edge, computer-driven electronics and cathode-ray displays,
which would have been very impressive if any of them ever worked. NASA
couldn't have built this car, much less the heirs to Joseph Lucas, the
British electronics' famous "Prince of Darkness." Still, I'd kill to
have one of these cars, and the O-scope and multi-meter to fix it.
1975 Trabant
This is the car that gave Communism a bad name. Powered by a two-stroke
pollution generator that maxed out at an ear-splitting 18 hp, the
Trabant was a hollow lie of a car constructed of recycled worthlessness
(actually, the body was made of a fiberglass-like Duroplast, reinforced
with recycled fibers like cotton and wood). A virtual antique when it
was designed in the 1950s, the Trabant was East Germany's answer to the
VW Beetle — a "people's car," as if the people didn't have enough to
worry about. Trabants smoked like an Iraqi oil fire, when they ran at
all, and often lacked even the most basic of amenities, like brake
lights or turn signals. But history has been kind to the Trabi.
Thousands of East Germans drove their Trabants over the border when the
Wall fell, which made it a kind of automotive liberator. Once across the
border, the none-too-sentimental Ostdeutschlanders immediately
abandoned their cars. Ich bin Junk!
1975 Triumph TR7
"The shape of things to come" quickly became the shape that came and
went, in a great cloud of "good riddance." The doorstop-shaped TR7, and
its rare V8-powered sibling TR8, were the last Triumphs sold in America
and among the last the company made before it folded its tents in 1984.
The trouble was not necessarily the engineering, or even the peculiar
design, which looked fit to split firewood. It was that the cars were so
horribly made. The thing had more short-circuits than a mixing board
with a bong spilled on it. The carburetors had to be constantly romanced
to stay in balance. Timing chains snapped. Oil and water pumps refused
to pump, only suck. The sunroof leaked and the concealable headlights
refused to open their peepers. One owner reports that the rear axle fell
out. How does that happen? It was as if British Leyland's workers were
trying to sabotage the country's balance of trade. Oh yeah.
1975 Morgan Plus 8 Propane
The venerable, and I do mean venerable, Morgan Motor Company of Malvern,
Warwickshire, has been making cars the old fashioned way since it was
radical and high-tech. With wing fenders, wooden-frame bodies, and
sliding-pillar front suspensions, Morgans are mailed to us direct from
1935. But in the early 1970s, new U.S. emissions and safety requirements
caused Morgan to pull out of the market. To the rescue came Bill Fink, a
San Francisco Moggie-phile and dealer who managed to get the car
certified by running its Buick/Rover V8 on propane. For years, small
numbers of these bouncy little roadsters had tanks of liquid propane
hung perilously behind the rear bumper. And people gave the Pinto grief?
1975 Bricklin SV1
The only Bricklin I ever sat in caught on fire and burned to the axles.
This is notably ironic, since the car's creator — the smooth-talking
Malcolm Bricklin — didn't include an ashtray or lighter in the car, to
discourage smoking. Despite its hand-removing, 100-lb. gullwing doors,
the SV1 was supposed to exemplify the safer car of the future; the name
stands for "Safety Vehicle 1." The bodies were made of brightly
colored, dent-resistant plastic, like PlaySkool furniture. Another
safety feature: incredible, crust-of-the-Earth-cooling slowness. All
those resin panels and compressible bumpers added hundreds of pounds
that the emissions-limited V8s couldn't handle. This thing couldn't
outrun the Rose Bowl Parade. Less than 3,000 of the wedgy coupes were
built, but Malcolm Bricklin was far from through, as we'll see.
1974 Jaguar XK-E V12 Series III
The 1961 Jaguar E-Type was heavenly, a dead-sexy, 150-mph supercar, a
stiletto heel to the heart of any car-loving man. By 1974, it had
morphed into this, this thing. In order to compensate for
power-sapping emissions controls required in the U.S., the car's primary
export market, Jaguar discontinued the reliable 4.2-liter six for an
anchor-heavy 5.3-liter V12, which was a total bitch to try to keep in
tune and made the car nose-heavy besides. Jaguar also discontinued the
elegant fixed-head coupe and offered the car only as a long wheelbase
2+2 or convertible. Imagine taking one of the world's most beautiful
cars and sticking it in a taffy puller. Not finished ruining the lines,
Jag plumped up the fenders, spoiling the smooth, aero-sleek contours of
the original. The piece de resistance, Jag affixed hideous rubber
bumpers — Dagmars, really — in a lame attempt to meet 5-mph bumper
standards. To which car enthusiasts can only say, "You bastards!"
1971 Ford Pinto
They shoot horses, don't they? Well, this is fish in a barrel. Of course
the Pinto goes on the Worst list, but not because it was a particularly
bad car — not particularly — but because it had a rather volatile
nature. The car tended to erupt in flame in rear-end collisions. The
Pinto is at the end of one of autodom's most notorious paper trails, the
Ford Pinto memo , which ruthlessly calculates the cost of reinforcing
the rear end ($121 million) versus the potential payout to victims ($50
million). Conclusion? Let 'em burn.
1971 Chrysler Imperial LeBaron Two-Door Hardtop
The glamorous Imperial marque was, by the late '60s, reduced to a
trashy, pseudo-luxury harlot walking the streets for its pimp, the
Chrysler Corporation. By 1971, only the Imperial LeBaron was left and it
shared the monstrous slab-sided "fuselage" styling of corporate
siblings like the Chrysler New Yorker and the Dodge Monaco. Appearing to
have been hewn from solid blocks of mediocrity, the Imperial LeBaron
two-door is memorable for having some of the longest fenders in history.
It was powered by Chrysler's silly-big 440-cu.-in. V8 and measured over
19 ft. long. The interior looked like a third-world casino. Here we are
approaching the nadir of American car building — obese,
under-engineered, horribly ugly. Or, it would be the nadir, except for
the abysmal 1980 Chrysler Imperial, which had an engine cursed by God.
The Imperial name was finally overthrown in 1983.
1970 Triumph Stag
You could put all the names of all the British Leyland cars of the late
'60s in a hat and you'd be guaranteed to pull out a despicable,
rotten-to-the-core mockery of a car. So consider the Triumph Stag merely
representative. Like its classmates, it had great style (penned by
Giovanni Michelotti) ruined by some half-hearted, half-witted, utterly
temporized engineering: To give the body structure greater stiffness, a
T-bar connected the roll hoop to the windscreen, and the windows were
framed in eye-catching chrome. The effect was to put the driver in a
shiny aquarium. The Stag was lively and fun to drive, as long as it ran.
The 3.0-liter Triumph V8 was a monumental failure, an engine that
utterly refused to confine its combustion to the internal side. The
timing chains broke, the aluminum heads warped like mad, the main
bearings would seize and the water pump would poop the bed — ka-POW! Oh, that piston through the bonnet, that is a spot of bother. We'll not hear the last of Triumph on this list.
1970 AMC Gremlin
American Motors designer Richard Teague — remember that name — was
responsible for some of the coolest cars of the era. The Gremlin wasn't
one of them. AMC was profoundly in the weeds at the time, and the
Gremlin was the company's attempt to beat Ford and GM to the subcompact
punch. To save time and money, Teague's design team basically whacked
off the rear of the AMC Hornet with a cleaver. The result was one of the
most curiously proportioned cars ever, with a long low snout, long
front overhang and a truncated tail, like the tail snapped off a
salamander. Cheap and incredibly deprived — with vacuum-operated
windshield wipers, no less — the Gremlin was also awful to drive, with a
heavy six-cylinder motor and choppy, unhappy handling due to the loss
of suspension travel in the back. The Gremlin was quicker than other
subcompacts but, alas, that only meant you heard the jeers and laughter
that much sooner.
1966 Peel Trident
Less a car than a 5th-grade science project on seed germination, the
Peel Trident was designed and built on the Isle of Man in the 1960s for
reasons as yet undetermined, kind of like Stonehenge. The Trident was
the evolution of the P-50, which at 4-ft., 2-in. in length could justify
its claim as the world's smallest car, or fastest barstool. The Trident
is a good example of why all those futuristic bubbletop cars of GM's
Motorama period would never work: The sun would cook you alive under the
Plexiglas. We in the car business call the phenomenon "solar gain." You
have to love the heroic name: Trident! More like Doofus on the half-shell.
1961 Corvair
Rear-engine cars are fun to drive and even more fun to crash. While
rear-engine packaging offers enormous advantages, putting the vehicle's
heaviest component behind the rear axle gives cars a distinct tendency
to spin out, sort of like an arrow weighted at the end. During World War
II, Nazi officers in occupied Czechoslovakia were banned from driving
the speedy rear-engined Tatras because so many had been killed behind
the wheel. Chevrolet execs knew the Corvair — a lithe and lovely car
with an air-cooled, flat-six in the back, a la the VW Beetle — was a
handful, but they declined to spend the few dollars per car to make the
swing-axle rear suspension more manageable. Ohhh, they came to regret
that. Ralph Nader put the smackdown on GM in his book Unsafe at Any Speed,
also noting that the Corvair's single-piece steering column could
impale the driver in a front collision. Ouch! Meanwhile, the Corvair had
other problems. It leaked oil like a derelict tanker. Its heating
system tended to pump noxious fumes into the cabin. It was offered for a
while with a gasoline-burner heater located in the front "trunk," a
common but dangerously dumb accessory at the time. Even so, my family
had a Corvair, white with red interior, and we loved it.
1961 Amphicar
A vehicle that promised to revolutionize drowning, the Amphicar was the
peacetime descendant of the Nazi Schwimmwagen (say it out loud — it's fun!).
The standard line is that the Amphicar was both a lousy car and a lousy
boat, but it certainly had its merits. It was reasonably agile on land,
considering, and fairly maneuverable on water, if painfully slow, with a
top speed of 7 mph. Its single greatest demerit — and this is a big one
— was that it wasn't particularly watertight. Its flotation was
entirely dependent on whether the bilge pump could keep up with the
leakage. If not, the Amphicar became the world's most aerodynamic
anchor. Even so, a large number of the nearly 4,000 cars built between
1961 and 1968 are still on the road/water. In fact, during the recent
floods in Britain, an Amphicar enthusiast served as a water taxi,
bringing water and groceries to a group of stranded schoolkids. Bully!
1958 Zunndapp Janus
Built in Nuremberg, Germany, by the well-established motorcycle firm
during a downturn in the two-wheeler market, this push-me-pull-you was
based on a Dornier prototype and powered by a 250-cc, 14-horsepower
engine, giving it a top speed of only 50 mph, assuming you had that kind
of time. Its unique feature was the rear-facing bench seat, which meant
passengers could watch in horror as traffic threatened to rear-end this
rolling roadblock of a car. Soon it became clear — "Ach Du Lieber!" —
that the Janus was a disaster, coming or going.
1958 MGA Twin Cam
A point of personal privilege. I own a 1960 MGA that I restored with my
own two hands, and it is a fantastic British sports car, with lovely
lines penned by Syd Enever, a stiff chassis, and a floggable character.
The car was introduced in 1955 as a replacement to the venerable TD and
was itself replaced by the MGB in 1962. Along the way, somebody decided
my little car was anemic — hey! I resent that! — so MG offered an
optional high-performance engine with dual overhead cams, thus the "twin
cam." It was a leaking, piston-burning, plug-fouling nightmare of a
motor that required absolute devotion to things like ignition timing,
fuel octane and rpm limits, less the whole shebang vomit connecting rods
and oil all over the road. Many years after the engine was taken out of
service, it was discovered that the problem lay in the carburetors. At
certain rpm, resonant frequencies would cause the fuel mixture to froth,
leaning out the fuel and burning the pistons. I've never had any such
trouble with my iron-block, pushrod, lawn tractor engine. I'm just
saying.
1958 Lotus Elite
Fiberglass was the '50s carbon fiber — tough, versatile, lighter than
steel and more affordable than aluminum. The Kaiser Darrin and Corvette
sports cars were wrapped in fiberglass bodies, for instance. Colin
Chapman, the founding engineer of Lotus, was bonkers for weight savings.
It was inevitable that he would be drawn to the material. And so, the
Elite. Weighing just 1,100 lbs and powered by a punchy, 75-hp Coventry
Climax engine, the Elite (Type 14) was a successful race car, winning
its class at the 24 Hours of Le Mans six times. It was also a lovely
little coupe, which made the moment when the suspension mounts punched
through the stressed-skin monocoque all the more pathetic. The
unreinforced fiberglass couldn't take the structural strain. In
Chapman's cars, failure was always an option.
1958 Ford Edsel
That's why we're all here, right? To celebrate E Day, the date 50 years
ago when Ford took one of the autodom's most hilarious pratfalls. But
why? It really wasn't that bad a car. True, the car was kind of homely,
fuel thirsty and too expensive, particularly at the outset of the late
'50s recession. But what else? It was the first victim of Madison Avenue
hyper-hype. Ford's marketing mavens had led the public to expect some
plutonium-powered, pancake-making wondercar; what they got was a
Mercury. Cultural critics speculated that the car was a flop because the
vertical grill looked like a vagina. Maybe. America in the '50s was
certainly phobic about the female business. How did the Edsel come to be
synonymous with failure? All of the above, consolidated into an
irrational groupthink and pressurized by a joyously catty media.
Interestingly, it was Ford President Robert McNamara who convinced the
board to bail out of the Edsel project; a decade later, it was McNamara,
then Secretary of Defense, who couldn't bring himself to quit the
disaster of Vietnam, even though he knew a lemon when he saw one.
1957 Waterman Aerobile
Waldo Waterman wanted aviation pioneer Glenn Curtiss to like him in the
worst way. Inspired by what was apparently Curtiss' casual remark about
driving an airplane away from the field, Waterman spent years developing
a roadable airplane. In 1934, he flew his first successful prototype,
the "Arrowplane," a high-wing monoplane with tricycle wheels. On the
ground, the wings folding against the fuselage like those of a fly (now
would be a good time to note that Waterman must have been crazy to get
airborne in such a contraption). Nonetheless, the Arrowplane goes down
as the first real flying car. Two decades later, Waterman finally
perfected, if that's the word, what he then called the Aerobile,
configured as a swept-wing "pusher" (prop in the back). There were few
customers with so consummate a death wish as to order their own
Aerobile, and Waterman's one working car-plane eventually wound up in
the Smithsonian, where it can't kill anyone.
1957 King Midget Model III
The King Midget story reminds us what a middle-class nation the U.S. was
in the '50s. Claud Dry and Dale Orcutt, of Athens, Ohio, buddies from
the Civil Air Patrol, wanted to sell bare-boned utility car that anybody
could afford, unlike that bloody elitist peacenik Henry Ford with his
fancy Model T. King Midget's cars made the Model T look like a Bugatti
Royale. In the late 1940s, they began offering the single-seat Model I
as a home-built, $500 kit, containing the frame, axles and sheetmetal
patterns, so that the body panels could be fabricated by local
tradesmen. Any single-cylinder engine would power it. The result was a
truly crap-tastic little vehicle, the four-wheel equivalent to those
Briggs-and-Stratton powered minibikes. Amazingly, Midget Motors
continued to develop and sell mini-cars until the late 1960s. The crown
jewel was the Model III, introduced in 1957, a little folded-steel
crackerbox powered by a 9-hp motor. Government safety standards, at long
last, put the King Midget out of our misery.
1956 Renault Dauphine
The most ineffective bit of French engineering since the Maginot Line,
the Renault Dauphine was originally to be named the Corvette, tres ironie.
It was, in fact, a rickety, paper-thin scandal of a car that, if you
stood beside it, you could actually hear rusting. Its most salient
feature was its slowness, a rate of acceleration you could measure with a
calendar. It took the drivers at Road and Track 32 seconds to
reach 60 mph, which would put the Dauphine at a severe disadvantage in
any drag race involving farm equipment. The fact that the ultra-cheap,
super-sketchy Dauphine sold over 2 million copies around the world is an
index of how desperately people wanted cars. Any cars.
1949 Crosley Hotshot
The first sports car produced in postwar America was a major hunk of
junk. Actually, at 1,100 lbs and 145 in. long, the Crosley Hotshot was a
minor hunk of junk, but at least it was slow and dangerous. A
wondrously mangled and compacted Hotshot can be glimpsed in the 1961
driver's ed scare film Mechanized Death. The Hotshot was the work
of consumer products pioneer Powel Crosley Jr., of Cincinnati, he of
Crosley radio fame. But what he really wanted to do was build cars,
which he did with middling failure until the doors closed in 1952. A
Hotshot actually won the "index of performance" — an honor for the best
speed for its displacement — at the 1950 Six Hours of Sebring, puttering
around at an average of 52 mph. What killed the Hotshot was its engine,
a dual-overhead cam .75-liter four cylinder, not cast in iron but
brazed together from pieces of stamped tin. When these brazed welds let
go, as they often did, things quickly got noisy, and hot.
1934 Chrysler/Desoto Airflow
The Airflow's "worst"-ness derives from its spectacularly bad timing.
Twenty years later, the car's many design and engineering innovations —
the aerodynamic singlet-style fuselage, steel-spaceframe construction,
near 50-50 front-rear weight distribution and light weight — would have
been celebrated. As it was, in 1934, the car's dramatic streamliner
styling antagonized Americans on some deep level, almost as if it were
designed by Bolsheviks. It didn't help that a few early Airflows had
major, engine-falling-out-type problems that stemmed from the radical
construction techniques required. Chrysler, and the even more hapless
Desoto, tried to devolve the Airflow stylistically, giving it more
conventional grill and raising the trunk into a kind of bustle (some
later models were named Airstream), but the damage was done. Sales were
abysmal. It wouldn't be the last time American car buyers looked at the
future and said, "no thanks."
1933 Fuller Dymaxion
Designer-genius R. Buckminster Fuller was one of the century's great
nutjobs, a walking unorthodoxy who originally conceived of the Dymaxion
as a flying automobile, or drivable plane, with jet engines and
inflatable wings. It would be one link in his vaguely totalitarian plan
for the people to live in mass-produced houses deposited on the
landscape by dirigibles. Okayyyy...Deprived of wings, the
Dymaxion was a three-wheel, ground-bound zeppelin, with a huge levered
A-arm carrying the rear wheel, which swiveled like the tail wheel of an
airplane. The first prototype had a wicked death wobble in the rear
wheel. The next two Dymaxions were bigger, heavier, and only marginally
more drivable. The third car had a stabilizer fin on top, which did
nothing to cure the Dymaxion's acute instability in crosswinds. A fatal
accident involving the car — cause unknown — doomed its public
acceptance. Though unworkable, this three-wheeled suppository was the
boldest of a series of futuristic, rear-engined cars of the 1930s,
including the Tatra, the Highway Aircraft Corporation's "Fascination"
car and, everybody's favorite, the Nazi's KdF-wagen.
1920 Briggs and Stratton Flyer
By 1920, the automotive was no longer a primitive
experiment. Companies such as Rolls-Royce, Cadillac, Hispano-Suiza and
Voisin were making potent and luxurious automobiles, the technical
achievements of the age. And then there was this, the Flyer, which is no
more than a motorized park bench on bicycle wheels. No suspension, no
bodywork, no windshield. It was actually a five wheeler, with the dinky
2-hp Briggs and Stratton engine driving a traction wheel on the back,
like a boat's outboard motor. The Flyer represents something we'll see
several times on this list: The drive to make the absolute cheapest,
most minimal automobile possible.
1913 Scripps-Booth Bi-Autogo
A 3,200-lb. motorcycle with training wheels, a V8 engine and enough
copper tubing to provide every hillbilly in the Ozarks with a still, the
Scripps-Booth Bi-Autogo was the daft experiment of James Scripps-Booth,
an heir of the Scripps publishing fortune and a self-taught — or
untaught — auto engineer. The Bi-Autogo was essentially a two-wheeled
vehicle, carrying its considerable heft on 37-in. wooden wheels. At slow
speeds, the driver could lower small wheels on outriggers to stabilize
the vehicle so it wouldn't plop over. This is not a case of the
advantage of hindsight; this was obviously a crazy idea, even in 1913.
The Bi-Autogo does enjoy the historical distinction of being the first
V8-powered vehicle ever built in Detroit, so you could argue it is the
beginning of an even greater folly.
1911 Overland OctoAuto
Milton Reeves had a very hard head and, apparently, very poor eyesight.
While the general conformation of the automobile was largely sorted out
in the first decade of the 20th century — particularly that business
about four wheels — Reeves thought perhaps eight or a minimum of six
wheels might provide a smoother ride. Welding in some bits to a 1910
Overland and adding two more axles and four more guncart-style wheels,
Reeves created the OctoAuto, proudly displaying it at the inaugural
Indianapolis 500. Like its Marvel Comics-worthy name, the car was a bit
of a monster, measuring over 20 ft. long. Talk about scaring the horses.
Zero orders for the patently ugly and silly OctoAuto apparently didn't
discourage Reeves, who tried again the next year with the Sextauto (six
wheels, single front axle design). Reeves is remembered today as the
inventor of the muffler, which is far from ignominy.
1909 Ford Model T
Uh-oh. Here comes trouble. Let's stipulate that the Model T did
everything that the history books say: It put America on wheels,
supercharged the nation's economy and transformed the landscape in ways
unimagined when the first Tin Lizzy rolled out of the factory. Well,
that's just the problem, isn't it? The Model T — whose mass production
technique was the work of engineer William C. Klann, who had visited a
slaughterhouse's "disassembly line" — conferred to Americans the notion
of automobility as something akin to natural law, a right endowed by our
Creator. A century later, the consequences of putting every living soul
on gas-powered wheels are piling up, from the air over our cities to
the sand under our soldiers' boots. And by the way, with its
blacksmithed body panels and crude instruments, the Model T was a piece
of junk, the Yugo of its day.
1899 Horsey Horseless
Somewhere between an early car and the head-in-the-bed scene in The Godfather,
the Horsey Horseless, the brainfart of inventor Uriah Smith of Battle
Creek, Mich., was intended to soothe the skittish nerves of our equine
servants. A wooden horse head was attached to the front of the chuffing
buggy in order to make it resemble a horse and carriage (Smith
recommended the horse head be hollow to contain volatile fuel — another
great idea). "The live horse would be thinking of another horse," said
Smith, "and before he could discover his error and see that he had been
fooled, the strange carriage would be passed." Stupid horse! It's not
clear if the Horsey Horseless was ever actually built or if it is a
chimera of auto history, but it reminds us just what a radical,
hard-to-conceptualize thing a horseless carriage was.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)